In reaction to the U.S. Senate’s unanimous vote to permit 9/11 victims’ families to sue Saudi Arabia in federal court, a article posted in the London-based Al-Hayat daily, by Saudi legal expert Katib al-Shammari, boasts that the U.S. masterminded the terror attacks as a means of generating a nebulous “enemy” in order garner public aid for a global war on terror.
The document by al-Shammari, translated by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), states that long-standing American policy is “built upon the principle of advance planning and future probabilities,” which the U.S. has currently turned toward the Saudi regime after being profitably employed against first the Taliban and al-Qaeda, then Saddam Hussein and his secular Baathist controlled Iraq.
Al-Shammari says the recent U.S. threats to “expose” information implicating the Saudi government are merely the continuation of a U.S. policy, which he describes as “victory by means of archive.” He illustrates that during the initial invasion of Iraq, under George H.W. Bush, Saddam Hussein was left alive and in power to be utilized as “a bargaining chip,” but upon figuring out that he was “no longer an ace up their sleeve” Washington moved to topple his government and install a U.S.-backed ruling party.
The terrorist attacks of 9/11 are currently the “ace up the sleeve” of the U.S. government, based on al-Shammari.
“September 11 is one of winning cards in the American archives, because all the wise people in the world who are experts on American policy and who analyze the images and the videos [of 9/11] agree unanimously that what happened in the [Twin] Towers was a purely American action, planned and carried out within the U.S. Proof of this is the sequence of continuous explosions that dramatically ripped through both buildings… Expert structural engineers demolished them with explosives, while the planes crashing [into them] only gave the green light for the detonation – they were not the reason for the collapse. But the U.S. still spreads blame in all directions. [This policy] can be dubbed ‘victory by means of archives.”
The popularity behind the attacks, writes al-Shammari, was to generate “an obscure enemy – terrorism – which became what American presidents blamed for all their mistakes” and that would offer justification for any “dirty operation” in any nation.
As outlined by al-Shammari’s report in Al-Hayat:
“On September 11, the U.S. attained several victories at the same time, that [even] the hawks [who were at that time] in the White House could not have imagined. Some of them can be enumerated as follows:
1. The U.S. created, in public opinion, an obscure enemy – terrorism – which became what American presidents blamed for all their mistakes, and also became the sole motivation for any dirty operation that American politicians and military figures desire to carry out in any country. [The] terrorism [label] was applied to Muslims, and specifically to Saudi Arabia.
2. Utilizing this incident [9/11], the U.S. launched a new age of global armament. Everyone wanted to acquire all kinds of weapons to defend themselves and at the same time battle the obscure enemy, terrorism – [even though] up to this very moment we do not know the essence of this terrorism of which the U.S. speaks, except [to say that] that it is Islamic…
3. The U.S. made the American people choose from two bad options: either live peacefully [but] remain exposed to the danger of death [by terrorism] at any moment, or starve in safety, because [the country’s budget will be spent on sending] the Marines even as far as Mars to defend you.”
The Saudi media has been in a craze since the unanimous Senate vote to allow for the House of Saud to be held accountable in U.S. federal court for the 9/11 attacks, with the U.S. being accused of being in alliance with Iran – to media warnings that passage of the “Satanic” bill would “open the gates of hell,” as noted by Breitbart.
Al-Shammari makes incredibly clear that he views the problem as the U.S. imperial machine itself, mentioning, “the nature of the U.S. is that it cannot exist without an enemy.”
The nature of the U.S. is that it cannot exist without an enemy… [For example,] after a period during which it did not fight anyone [i.e. following World War II], the U.S. created a new kind of war – the Cold War… Then, when the Soviet era ended, after we Muslims helped the religions and fought Communism on their [the Americans’] behalf, they began to see Muslims as their new enemy! The U.S. saw a need for creating a new enemy – and planned, organized, and carried this out [i.e. blamed Muslims for terrorism]. This will never end until it [the U.S.] accomplishes the goals it has set for itself.
While it appears fighting Islamic terrorism is great for boosting fear and State propaganda meant to elicit compliant civilian populations that passively take loss of liberty for promises of greater security, the military-industrial complex requires a bigger enemy to justify their $600 billion dollar-a-year budgets, therefore starting the change to labeling Russia/China as “aggressive Russia/China,” in an attempt to start to pivot away from one bogeyman to other, more profitable, ones.
Feel free to leave a comment. We would like to know what you think.