2nd Amb. Comes Forward… Decimates CIA Election Claims… States He Knows Where Information Came From… Certainly Not Russia!

Written by JayWill7497

The Conservative Tribune reports, The liberal media have been playing up a report by the Central Intelligence Agency that hackers aligned with the Russian government had allegedly provided Julian Assange with the hacked emails his website WikiLeaks published during the fall, but a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan is going public again to blow the story out of the water.

The liberal media have already been playing up a review by the Central Intelligence Agency that hackers lined up with the Russian government had purportedly supplied Julian Assange with the hacked emails his website WikiLeaks published during the fall, but a ex – British ambassador to Uzbekistan is going public yet again to blow the account out of the water.

“As [WikiLeaks founder] Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians,” ex – Ambassador Craig Murray published on his blog Monday morning, including that he had direct connection to the original source. “As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two …

“Now both Julian Assange and I have stated definitively the leak does not come from Russia. Do we credibly have access? Yes, very obviously. Very, very few people can be said to definitely have access to the source of the leak. The people saying it is not Russia are those who do have access.”

Furthermore, where the hacks came from had no real bearing on what they had exposed, which was that both the Democrat Party and failed Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton were infected.

“(I)f Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie … had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie … had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton Foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence … had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people,” then perhaps she would have won, Murray included.

It felt as if the lightning-speed propagate of this unconfirmed Russian hacker conspiracy among liberal media outlets was consequently practically nothing more than an effort by liberal Democrats and their media sycophants to deflect fault for Clinton’s legendary loss.

Murray’s posting was the second time in two days that a ex – ambassador had cast uncertainty on the idea.

Speaking Sunday on CBS News, John Bolton, ex – U.S. ambassador to the United States, stated the conspiracy theory may even be a possible “false flag.”

“It is not at all clear to me, just viewing this from the outside, that this hacking into the DNC and the RNC computers was not a false flag operation,” he stated, suggesting that the Obama administration was working in conjunction with the liberal media to mislead the public to distract them from other issues.

As for Assange and officials in Russia, both have apparently rejected accusations they they conspired to intervene with the 2016 presidential election.

“The Kremlin has rejected the hacking accusations, while the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has previously said the DNC leaks were not linked to Russia,” The Guardian documented Sunday.

And Murray, who has been expressive before about the case of Russian participation, minced no words about where he placed the fault for the latest spin on the election.

“It is terrible that the prime conduit for this paranoid nonsense is a once great newspaper, the Washington Post, which far from investigating executive power, now is a sounding board for totally evidence free anonymous source briefing of utter bullshit from the executive, he wrote.

CIA’s Russia hacking claims dismissed as ‘bulls***’ by former UK ambassador Craig Murray
‘I know who leaked them. I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack’
Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange, has dismissed the CIA’s claims that Russia interfered in last month’s presidential election as “bulls***”.
On Friday the Washington Post reported on a secret assessment by the CIA, which concluded that Russian intelligence hacked the Democratic National Committee’s servers and that of Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta, specifically to help Trump win the presidency.

Mr Murray said: “I know who leaked them. I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.

“If what the CIA are saying is true, and the CIA’s statement refers to people who are known to be linked to the Russian state, they would have arrested someone if it was someone inside the United States.

“America has not been shy about arresting whistleblowers and it’s not been shy about extraditing hackers. They plainly have no knowledge whatsoever.”

The Kremlin has rejected the hacking accusations while Julian Assange has previously said the DNC leaks were not linked to Russia.


Read Also NEW YORK TIMES Confesses CIA Is Lacking Proof: Russian Hacking Claims Manufactured To Support Hillary Clinton!


These People Are A Danger To Themselves And Others! Wake Up!!!!!!


Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this article or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Fusion Laced Illusions content!


Contact Fusion Laced Illusions by email.
You can reach us at [email protected] Letters may be published. Want to see other people talking about Fusion Laced Illusions? Check out our letters to the editor.


About the author



Reporter, Journalist, Blogger, Researcher. I am committed to providing information by posting/archiving videos, articles, and links. I also investigate to raise awareness on numerous issues, inspire critical thinking, involvement, and hopefully to help make our world a better place for all. “The truth, always the truth at all costs”