Redsilverj reports: Russians Hacked Election For Donald Trump To Win Conspiracy Theory EXPOSED
One of the most predominanent narratives of the presidential race was that Russian President Vladimir Putin was attempting to upend the election – in a way that aided President-elect Donald Trump.
Politicians of both parties took offense to the supposed actions of a U.S. adversary. Trump, nevertheless, often brushed off claims that Russia was meddling in the election to his benefit, even while Hillary Clinton accused that Trump was inviting Russia.
“It’s pretty clear you won’t admit that the Russians have engaged in cyberattacks against the United States of America, that you encouraged espionage against our people, that you are willing to spout the Putin line, sign up for his wish list, break up NATO, do whatever he wants to do, and that you continue to get help from him, because he has a very clear favorite in this race,” Clinton stated to Trump at the third presidential debate in October.
Clinton’s unsupported claims would lead you to imagine that Putin wished Trump to win, and his actions throughout the election aided to guarantee that outcome. Statements that Russian government hacked Democratic politicians, had undue impact over the Trump campaign and even that it compromised voting machines all added to this plot.
We sought to find out the current proof both for and in opposition to Russian involvement. While investigations may possibly reveal a lot more later, we discovered that there certainly is not definitive proof of Russian involvement for some of these claims, and whether or not Putin truly favors President Trump remains an open dilemma.
“There is likely some truth to some of these allegations, but there has also been a bit of Russia hysteria recently on the part of some pundits, politicians and media,” stated Scott Radnitz, a professor at the University of Washington presently researching conspiracy theories in post-Soviet states.
Did Putin favor Trump to Clinton?
Some of Trump’s foreign positions come about to dovetail with Putin’s. This consists of Trump’s potential unwillingness to safeguard NATO allies, support for Russia’s takeover of Crimea in Ukraine, and willingness to take into account lifting sanctions against Russia. He has also lauded Putin as a “strong leader.”
But experts claimed this alone is not proof that Putin is Trump’s puppeteer, or that he even preferred him as president.
“Trump’s comments on Russia have been very unusual, strangely at odds with the dominant view of both parties in the U.S.,” Radnitz said. “But that’s literally all we know.”
It’s no secret that Putin does not like Clinton. She frequently tussled with Putin and his administration while serving as secretary of state, overseeing the so-called “Russian reset.” But he also may not enjoy Trump’s unpredictable nature, stated Dmitry Gorenburg, a senior research scientist at CNA, a think tank.
Putin thinks Clinton stoked protests in Russia surrounding its 2011 elections. So if Putin did purposely interfere in the U.S. election, it may have been to get back at Clinton instead of an effort to prop up Trump, Gorenburg included.
The most tangible instance of Russian involvement in the election was the Democratic National Committee email hack. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., resigned from the DNC chair position as a consequence of embarrassing emails disclosed in the resultant dump.
The federal intelligence community, in addition to private cybersecurity analysts, are convinced that Russian actors were behind the hack. The Homeland Security Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence supplied a joint statement Oct. 7 expressing they believed people at the top levels of Russian government directed the attack in an attempt to interfere in the election.
Some private security researchers also imagine Russians stole and leaked emails from Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta.
Some Russian media websites, like RT and Sputnik, are well-known to have spread some fake or false news accounts during the election.
For instance, Sputnik published an article that stated the Podesta email dump provided certain incriminating comments about the Benghazi scandal, an allegation that turned out to be erroneous. Trump himself repeated this false account.
But claims that the Russian government called for these fake news posts are unproven.
It’s far more probable that these websites were being opportunistic, posting them on their own accord to drive traffic, Gorenburg stated.
Trump definitely has carried out business in Russia or with Russian investments, like taking the Miss Universe pageant to Moscow in 2013. Without his tax returns, nevertheless, we don’t know the full degree of his business dealings there.
Trump has taken on advisers with clearer-cut links to Russia. Top adviser Paul Manafort, for instance, consulted for Putin-backed Ukrainian politicians. Foreign policy adviser Carter Page advised Russian gas giant Gazprom, and national security adviser Michael Flynn attended an RT gala with Putin.
The experience of Trump’s advisers may have shaped Trump’s policy positions. But the FBI looked into the problem and found no proof of a direct connection between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, consistent with news reports.
“Even if something is consistent with Russian government interests, it doesn’t mean the Russian government did it,” stated Yoshiko Herrera, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who studies Russia and ex – Soviet states.
Before the election, Russian actors gained accessibility to the voter registration system in Arizona and potentially other states. It is not apparent if the perpetrators were directed by the Russian government or if they were private criminals.
But with regards to Election Day itself, President Barack Obama’s administration stated in a statement that it is convinced “our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective.”
Some computer scientists flagged anomalies in the results of several counties that utilized electronic voting in three swing states – Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan – forcing calls for recounts. But statements that Russians are to blame for these vote tally anomalies, through hacking or other means, are baseless.
So what does it all indicate?
According to the proof, it appears extremely improbable that actions by the Russian government added in any decisive way to Trump’s win over Clinton.
There may have been some influence on the problems that made headlines in the course of the campaign, such as Trump’s Putin-friendly advisers pushing him to make Putin-friendly statements, or the hacking of DNC emails.
Nevertheless, Gorenburg stated, policymakers should still be troubled about the chance that a foreign government may have tried to meddle in a domestic election.
“Regardless of the extent of the impact we should be concerned about the attempt,” he stated. “It is something to investigate regardless of whether we think it affected the result.”
These People Are A Danger To Themselves And Others! Wake Up!!!!!!
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this article or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Fusion Laced Illusions content!
Contact Fusion Laced Illusions by email.
You can reach us at JWilliams7497@gmail.com Letters may be published. Want to see other people talking about Fusion Laced Illusions? Check out our letters to the editor.